{"id":1681,"date":"2007-12-15T07:05:48","date_gmt":"2007-12-15T11:05:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/?p=1681"},"modified":"2007-12-15T07:05:48","modified_gmt":"2007-12-15T11:05:48","slug":"drug-use-in-pregnancy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/1681","title":{"rendered":"Drug use in pregnancy"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>General<br \/>\ninformation:<\/h4>\n<li>FDA pregnancy categories<\/li>\n<ul>\n<li>A &#8211; controlled studies show no rise<\/li>\n<li>C &#8211; risk cannot be ruled out<\/li>\n<li>D &#8211; positive evidence of risk<\/li>\n<li>X &#8211; contraindicated in<br \/>\npregnancy<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<li><strong>prescription drug use common during<br \/>\n  pregnancy<\/strong><\/li>\n<ul>\n<li>retrospective study of 152,531 women who delivered<br \/>\n    infants in 1996-2000<\/li>\n<li>64% were prescribed a medication other than vitamin<br \/>\n    or mineral supplement during pregnancy<\/li>\n<li>almost 40% received category C drugs while pregnant,<br \/>\n    1.9% received category D drugs, 0.1% received category X drugs<\/li>\n<li>Reference &#8211; Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004<br \/>\n    Aug;191(2):398<br \/>\n    in J Watch Online 2004 Oct 19 and in JAMA 2004 Oct<br \/>\n    27;292(16):1946<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<li>review of drugs in pregnancy can be found in N Engl J Med 1998 Apr<br \/>\n  16;338(16):1128<\/li>\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/mail.google.com\/mail\/images\/pdf.gif\" alt=\"pdf\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" \/><\/td>\n<td width=\"7\">&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td><strong>Drug use in pregnancy.pdf<\/strong><br \/>\n259K    <a href=\"..\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/12\/182\/drug-use-in-pregnancy.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Descargar art\u00edculo<\/a>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>General information: FDA pregnancy categories A &#8211; controlled studies show no rise C &#8211; risk cannot be ruled out D &#8211; positive evidence of risk X &#8211; contraindicated in pregnancy<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","","category-articulos-cientificos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}