{"id":37029,"date":"2014-08-01T08:08:26","date_gmt":"2014-08-01T12:38:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/?p=37029"},"modified":"2014-08-02T05:44:47","modified_gmt":"2014-08-02T10:14:47","slug":"reported-estimates-of-adverse-pregnancy-outcomes-among-women-with-and-without-syphilis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/37029","title":{"rendered":"Reported Estimates of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among Women with and without Syphilis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>PLoS One. 2014 Jul 15;9(7):e102203. doi: 10.1371\/journal.pone.0102203. eCollection 2014.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nReported Estimates of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among Women with and without Syphilis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.<\/p>\n<p>Qin J1, Yang T1, Xiao S2, Tan H1, Feng T3, Fu H1.<br \/>\nAuthor information<\/p>\n<p>Abstract<\/p>\n<p>BACKGROUND:<\/p>\n<p>To estimate probability of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) among women with and without syphilis through a systematic review of published literatures.<\/p>\n<p>METHODOLOGY\/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:<\/p>\n<p>Chinese and English literatures were searched for studies assessing pregnancy outcomes in the presence of maternal syphilis through August 2013. The prevalence estimates were summarized and analyzed by meta-analysis. Fifty-four literatures involving 11398 syphilitic women and 43342 non-syphilitic women were included from 4187 records initially found. Among untreated mothers with syphilis, pooled estimates were 76.8% for all APOs, 36.0% for congenital syphilis, 23.2% for preterm, 23.4% for low birth weight, 26.4% for stillbirth or fetal loss, 14.9% for miscarriage and 16.2% for neonatal deaths. Among syphilitic mother receiving treatment only in the late trimester (&gt;28 weeks), pooled estimates were 64.4% for APOs, 40.6% for congenital syphilis, 17.6% for preterm, 12.4% for low birth weight, and 21.3% for stillbirth or fetal loss. Among syphilitic mothers with high titers (?1?8), pooled estimates were 42.8% for all APOs, 25.8% for congenital syphilis, 15.1% for preterm, 9.4% for low birth weight, 14.6% for stillbirth or fetal loss and 16.0% for neonatal deaths. Among non-syphilitic mothers, the pooled estimates were 13.7% for all APOs, 7.2% for preterm birth, 4.5% for low birth weight, 3.7% for stillbirth or fetal loss, 2.3% for miscarriage and 2.0% for neonatal death. Begg&#8217;s rank correlation test indicated little evidence of publication bias (P&gt;0.10). Substantial heterogeneity was found across studies in the estimates of all adverse outcomes for both women with syphilis (I2?=?93.9%; P&lt;0.0001) and women without syphilis (I2?=?94.8%; P&lt;0.0001).<\/p>\n<p>CONCLUSIONS\/SIGNIFICANCE:<\/p>\n<p>Syphilis continues to be an important cause of substantial perinatal morbidity and mortality, which reminds that policy-makers charged with resource allocation that the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis is a public health priority<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PLoS One. 2014 Jul 15;9(7):e102203. doi: 10.1371\/journal.pone.0102203. eCollection 2014.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","","category-articulos-cientificos","category-generales"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37029"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37029\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/piel-l.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}